Blog

 This guest post was written by Yifat, on behalf of Madre, a Jolkona Foundation partner.

Fatima Ahmed, the president of the Sudanese women’s organization Zenab for Women in Development, recently stopped by the MADRE office with exciting news.  The ground-breaking women farmers union led by her organization had harvested a successful crop-and the results are changing people’s lives.
Founded by Zenab in 2006 and supported by MADRE, this project has brought together women who make up the majority of farmers working on small-scale organic farms in Sudan.  Amplifying their voices, they have been able to demand access to seeds, better tools, and assistance in farming.

Women have been able to share knowledge on how to better prepare their land for cultivation and how to manage weeds that destroy the crops. Fatima was excited to share that these women have not only been successful in providing food for their own families but have also been able to provide crops for other regions in Sudan.

Fatima shared with us a story about one village where the women had been denied access to education. With her help and with the resources generated by their successful farming projects, they organized a much-needed adult education program. The women built a center where they could host their school and opened the space for community meetings.

Their improved farming has increased production and has enabled them to generate an income, in some areas even allowing them the chance to bring in electricity.  In yet another village, three women farmers were able to raise enough funds to send their daughters to university, a victory that would have been otherwise impossible.

Together, women farmers are creating new possibilities for themselves, their families and their communities.

Microsoft announced a contest inviting non-profits to submit videos about 7 ways that PCs are changing the world. We thought we would be a great fit, except there was one catch. It needed to be made by folks outside of Microsoft. We were lucky enough to have enthusiastic supporters who came together to put together this video in a very short time.

Special thanks to Henry, Cheryl, Matthew, Kalid, Lindsay, Gaffer, and Raymond!

Let us know what you think about the video and feel free leave your comments!

Last month, David Roodman, a research fellow at the Center for Global Development, set off a storm with a post on Kiva’s model. His post received tons of comments, a reply blog post from Matt Flannery (Kiva CEO), and a revision of the Kiva website. Couple of days ago, even the New York Times published an article about this issue. We have received lots of emails from our supporters asking us what is our response to this public discussion.

Before I get into our thoughts, here is some background info:

Transparency has been a problem in the nonprofit sector for years. We have tried different approaches to tackle this problem. For example, World Vision provides photo of the child a donor is supporting. Charity Navigator gives the donor information about the financial efficiency of an organization. However, donors still feel that they don’t have a true grasp of exactly how their gifts are being utilized. This is especially true for donors who give small amounts of money.

With the technological advances of the past decade and rise in popularity of social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) smaller donors are now demanding more transparency.  If you add the current economic conditions, there is increasing pressure on non-profits to show how every dollar is being spent. It is not easy for non-profits to change their models overnight to meet this new demand. It requires significant investment in building an infrastructure and requires more manpower – something that is hard for many organizations to justify. So, what you have are these organizations (non-profits and MFIs) with very good intentions building make-shift solutions that never quite meet the donors’ needs. This leads to the inconsistencies that Mr. Roodman pointed out in his blog post.

Before I continue, it is important, to make couple of observations here:

  1. Organizations like Kiva and GlobalGiving have been real pioneers in this field. They have shown that there is a really high demand from the everyday donor to feel connected to the change that their small donations are making. For the recent criticisms facing these organizations, we can’t forget the tremendous impact they have had so far.
  2. There isn’t a perfect system and it is impossible to devise one. There will always be people who will try to find the loopholes and abuse the system. However, we shouldn’t let perfect get in the way of the good. We should try to explore as many of these models as possible and try to take them forward as much as possible.

The challenge facing all of us in the nonprofit sector is how do we effectively provide transparency to donors without burdening the organizations excessively? To meet the donor demand for high-impact and high transparency, we believe the following conditions have to be met:

  1. Make donors feel like he/she is a Changemaker by showing the impact for their every donation, including the small ones. Every dollar truly does count.
  2. Give donor choices. Not every person wants to give a loan or feed a child. However, most people want to make a difference. Give them as many choices as possible.
  3. Measure the impact so that everyone involved feels like we are making progress. No one wants to see money being thrown into a black hole.
  4. Connect with the smaller donors. Individually, they do not have a lot of money to donate, but, as a group they can provide critical support to a cause. Nowhere was this more evident than last year’s US presidential elections.
  5. Provide affordable tools to nonprofit organizations so that they can engage the donors in an efficient, cost-effective way and more importantly, learn from each other and knowledge share best practices.

I founded Jolkona Foundation with the goal of meeting the conditions outlined above. Jolkona Foundation seeks to inspire a new generation of philanthropists to make high-impact changes through low-cost solutions. The key differences between Jolkona Foundation and Kiva or Global Giving is that we provide donation level feedback – i.e. every donation gets a unique feedback. We work with our non-profit partners to develop rich, meaningful feedback for the donors. For example, with $40, a donor can provide year-long accelerated education to a girl in Afghanistan. In exchange, the donor receives a photo and background info about the girl at the time of donation and a report card at the end of the year. We spend a significant amount of time working with each of our partners to create the feedback type that would be cost-effective for them, compelling for the donor, and not be detrimental to security and privacy of the beneficiary. It is important to note that our partners’ implement the donations in 1 of 2 ways:

  1. Once the donation is received, the partner actually goes and implements the gift. For example, if you provide books in tibet, our partner actually goes to the local market and buys books once the donation is received.
  2. The donations are used to release “locked” funds for the partners so that they can go and use those funds for other purposes. Let’s say our partner already has plans to educate 100 girls for a cost of $40 per girl in Afghanistan this year. That means they have $4,000 dedicated for this purpose this year. If they receive donations for educating 10 girls, then, that would free up $400 from their allocated funds for other purposes.

Rich feedback for donors is not our only focus. We are also building the infrastructure that other nonprofits (i.e. our partners) can leverage, thereby, allowing them to focus more on the job that they are good at – making a difference on the ground. For example, our partners are able to connect with each other through a private discussion group and share best practices with each other.

We are still a very young organization and we still have a long way to go. However, we are encouraged by the trends in the philanthropic sector. We will see an increasing number of non-profit organizations embrace tranparency and provide donors with an experience that is richer than anything we have ever seen before. Jolkona Foundation will continue to do our best to meet the needs of both the donors and the partner organizations.

I invite your comments and thoughts on this post as part of the ongoing dialogue. We are eager to learn from people who are passionate about this topic.

Last month, David Roodman, a research fellow at the Center for Global Development, set off a storm with a post on Kiva’s model. His post received tons of comments, a reply blog post from Matt Flannery (Kiva CEO), and a revision of the Kiva website. Couple of days ago, even the New York Times published an article about this issue. We have received lots of emails from our supporters asking us what is our response to this public discussion.

Before I get into our thoughts, here is some background info:

Transparency has been a problem in the nonprofit sector for years. We have tried different approaches to tackle this problem. For example, World Vision provides photo of the child a donor is supporting. Charity Navigator gives the donor information about the financial efficiency of an organization. However, donors still feel that they don’t have a true grasp of exactly how their gifts are being utilized. This is especially true for donors who give small amounts of money.

With the technological advances of the past decade and rise in popularity of social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) smaller donors are now demanding more transparency.  If you add the current economic conditions, there is increasing pressure on non-profits to show how every dollar is being spent. It is not easy for non-profits to change their models overnight to meet this new demand. It requires significant investment in building an infrastructure and requires more manpower – something that is hard for many organizations to justify. So, what you have are these organizations (non-profits and MFIs) with very good intentions building make-shift solutions that never quite meet the donors’ needs. This leads to the inconsistencies that Mr. Roodman pointed out in his blog post.

Before I continue, it is important, to make couple of observations here:

  1. Organizations like Kiva and GlobalGiving have been real pioneers in this field. They have shown that there is a really high demand from the everyday donor to feel connected to the change that their small donations are making. For the recent criticisms facing these organizations, we can’t forget the tremendous impact they have had so far.
  2. There isn’t a perfect system and it is impossible to devise one. There will always be people who will try to find the loopholes and abuse the system. However, we shouldn’t let perfect get in the way of the good. We should try to explore as many of these models as possible and try to take them forward as much as possible.

The challenge facing all of us in the nonprofit sector is how do we effectively provide transparency to donors without burdening the organizations excessively? To meet the donor demand for high-impact and high transparency, we believe the following conditions have to be met:

  1. Make donors feel like he/she is a Changemaker by showing the impact for their every donation, including the small ones. Every dollar truly does count.
  2. Give donor choices. Not every person wants to give a loan or feed a child. However, most people want to make a difference. Give them as many choices as possible.
  3. Measure the impact so that everyone involved feels like we are making progress. No one wants to see money being thrown into a black hole.
  4. Connect with the smaller donors. Individually, they do not have a lot of money to donate, but, as a group they can provide critical support to a cause. Nowhere was this more evident than last year’s US presidential elections.
  5. Provide affordable tools to nonprofit organizations so that they can engage the donors in an efficient, cost-effective way and more importantly, learn from each other and knowledge share best practices.

I founded Jolkona Foundation with the goal of meeting the conditions outlined above. Jolkona Foundation seeks to inspire a new generation of philanthropists to make high-impact changes through low-cost solutions. The key differences between Jolkona Foundation and Kiva or Global Giving is that we provide donation level feedback – i.e. every donation gets a unique feedback. We work with our non-profit partners to develop rich, meaningful feedback for the donors. For example, with $40, a donor can provide year-long accelerated education to a girl in Afghanistan. In exchange, the donor receives a photo and background info about the girl at the time of donation and a report card at the end of the year. We spend a significant amount of time working with each of our partners to create the feedback type that would be cost-effective for them, compelling for the donor, and not be detrimental to security and privacy of the beneficiary. It is important to note that our partners’ implement the donations in 1 of 2 ways:

  1. Once the donation is received, the partner actually goes and implements the gift. For example, if you provide books in tibet, our partner actually goes to the local market and buys books once the donation is received.
  2. The donations are used to release “locked” funds for the partners so that they can go and use those funds for other purposes. Let’s say our partner already has plans to educate 100 girls for a cost of $40 per girl in Afghanistan this year. That means they have $4,000 dedicated for this purpose this year. If they receive donations for educating 10 girls, then, that would free up $400 from their allocated funds for other purposes.

Rich feedback for donors is not our only focus. We are also building the infrastructure that other nonprofits (i.e. our partners) can leverage, thereby, allowing them to focus more on the job that they are good at – making a difference on the ground. For example, our partners are able to connect with each other through a private discussion group and share best practices with each other.

We are still a very young organization and we still have a long way to go. However, we are encouraged by the trends in the philanthropic sector. We will see an increasing number of non-profit organizations embrace tranparency and provide donors with an experience that is richer than anything we have ever seen before. Jolkona Foundation will continue to do our best to meet the needs of both the donors and the partner organizations.

I invite your comments and thoughts on this post as part of the ongoing dialogue. We are eager to learn from people who are passionate about this topic.

This guest post was written by Derya Rose, on behalf of Yachana Foundation, a Jolkona Foundation partner.

Evenings in rural Ecuador are often filled with the familiar whirring of diesel generators, providing a little bit of power to communities off the country’s main electricity grid. When these machines are off, the soft glow of candles fills the night. Families cooking, students studying and children playing – all by candlelight.

Although this environment may seem charming (after all, candlelight often inspires romantic thoughts), it presents a real burden to the rural poor. Families not only pay up to $270 per year for candles, they also encounter frequent burns as well as accidentally set fire to their houses on occasion. Add strained eyes from reading in dim light to the equation, and one can see that this situation isn’t quite as charming.

Founded by Douglas McMeekin, the Yachana Foundation has been operating in the Ecuadorian Amazon since 1991.  Recently, Douglas found out about an innovative, flexible mini solar panel that was designed specifically for use by the rural poor, or who Douglas calls, the people that live at the base of the economic pyramid.  This solar panel, which contains no glass and is virtually unbreakable, provides clean power to four useful accessories. The first is an LED lamp, which can be recharged over 500 times and can last between six and thirty hours per charge, depending on the intensity selected. This product alone can easily solve many of the economic, health and environmental problems posed by candle use. Other accessories include rechargeable radio batteries, a mobile phone charger and a spare battery pack, each with its own set of economic, social and environmental benefits.

We at Yachana found in these products an opportunity to operate a triple bottom line distribution business. First, the end user would enjoy the benefits described above (and more), allowing them to invest more money on their kids’ educations, health, clothes, businesses and so on.  Next, the environment would benefit from tons less spent on the disposal of wax as well as millions of used batteries being discarded.  Lastly, 100% of the business’ profits would go to support the Yachana Technical High School.

Right now, with the help of various government agencies, we are rolling out this product regionally and aim to offer it in all regions of Ecuador within the next year. 

If you would like more information about how you can support Yachana and it’s various community development initiatives, please contact Hugh Yarbrough at hugh.yarbrough@yachana.org.ec

GET INVOLVED!